2020欧洲杯谁能夺冠

Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel Idowu, René Schmidpeter, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, Mara Del Baldo, Rute Abreu

Community of Practices

  • Cristiana CattaneoEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_921-1
  • 50 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

“We all belong to communities of practice… in fact communities of practice are everywhere” (Wenger 1998, p. 6). A Community of Practice (CoP) is a group of people who share similar challenges, interact regularly, learn from and with each other, and improve their ability to address their challenges. The theory of CoP starts from the idea of situated learning and learning by interaction and studies how a CoP generates and diffuses knowledge among members and in the organization in which the CoP arises and grows. In this chapter, CoP is described, taking into consideration components, characteristics, relationships among members in the CoP and between the CoP and organizations, benefits and limitations in activating a CoP, and factors that enable or obstacle the success of a CoP. It emerges that CoP exist in many contexts and that the presence of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Armanios, D. E. (2012). Sustainable development as a community of practice: Insights from Rural Water Projects in Egypt. Sustainable Development, 20, 42–57.  .
  2. Bardon, T., & Borzillo, S. (2016). Communities of practice: Control or autonomy? Journal of Business Strategy, 37(1), 11–18.  .
  3. Borzillo, S., & Kaminska-Labbè, R. (2011). Step in or step out: Supporting innovation through communities of practice. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(3), 29–36.  .
  4. Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29, 25–42.  .
  5. Bradbury, S., & Middlemiss, L. (2015). The role of learning in sustainable communities of practice. Local Environment, 20(7), 796–810.  .
  6. Cattaneo, C., Signori, S., & Acerbis, E. (2018). Potenzialita’ e limiti delle comunita’ di pratica in sanita’: un caso di studio. In S. Corbella, L. Marchi, & F. Rossignoli (Eds.), Nuove frontiere del reporting aziendale la comunicazione agli stakeholders tra vincoli normativi e attese informative (pp. 122–154). Milano: Franco Angeli editore.
  7. Choi, M. (2006). Communities of practice: An alternative learning model for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 143–146.  .
  8. Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540.  .
  9. Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Oxford: Elsevier-Butterworth Heinemann.
  10. Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 171–227.
  11. Dunham, L., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.
  12. Gonzalez, A., Donnelly, A., Jones, M., Klostermann, J., Groot, A., & Breil, M. (2011). Community of practice approach to developing urban sustainability indicators. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(4), 591–617.  .
  13. Iyalomhe, F., Jensen, A., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2013). The science–policy interface for climate change adaptation: The contribution of communities of practice theory. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 368–380.  .
  14. Kerno, S. J. (2008). Limitations of communities of practice. A consideration of unresolved issues and difficulties in the approach. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 69–78.  .
  15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Marr, B., Schiuma, G., & Neely, A. (2004). Intellectual capital – Defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 551–569.  .
  17. Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Roles of communities of practice for the development of the society. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 6(3), 27–46.
  18. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD.
  20. Pattinson, S., Preece, D., & Dawson, P. (2016). In search of innovative capabilities of communities of practice: A systematic review and typology for future research. Management Learning, 47(5), 506–524.  .
  21. Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26, 335–347.  
  22. Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work? Human Relations, 70(4), 389–409.  .
  23. Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639.
  24. Schofield, K., Analoui, B. D., Brooks, J., & Husain, S. F. (2018). Competitive communities of practice, knowledge sharing, and Machiavellian participation: A case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(3), 210–221.  .
  25. Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100–111.
  26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kristijan Krač

There are no affiliations available